ESCWA Publication: E/ESCWA/EDID/2018/TP.1
Country: Arab region
Publication Type: Information material
Cluster: Shared Economic Prosperity
Focus Area: Financing for development
Initiatives: Illicit Financial Flows, Artificial Intelligence Budgeting, Arab Financing for Development Gateway, Arab Financing for Development Scorecard
SDGs: Agenda 2030
Keywords: Debt, Fiscal policy, International trade, Financial flows
Illicit financial flows in the Arab region
January 2018
Illicit financial flows (IFFs) are constantly evolving outpacing detection at every corner. IFFs undermine the rule of law, distort macro-economic stability, and raise severe security complications for the Arab region. These flows constitute substantial leakages to domestic public revenues that could have otherwise been harnessed to finance national and regional efforts devoted to achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Measuring IFFs is a challenge, not least since no tool or process can effectively measure the clandestine nature of the underlying activity. Precision in this field remains unachievable. Beyond deliberate collusion, several factors explain why gaps in trade statistics exist. Some argue that trade gaps may not be a useful entry point to estimate misinvoicing. Others demonstrate that gaps in reported trade statistics are neither erratic nor a statistical fiction, and that deliberate misinvoicing is a significant component of gaps in reported trade statistics.
Related content
Financing for development
,
Illicit financial flows (IFFs) are constantly evolving outpacing detection at every corner. IFFs undermine the rule of law, distort macro-economic stability, and raise severe security complications for the Arab region. These flows constitute substantial leakages to domestic public revenues that could have otherwise been harnessed to finance national and regional efforts devoted to achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Measuring IFFs is a challenge, not least since no tool or process can effectively measure the clandestine nature of the underlying activity. Precision in this field remains unachievable. Beyond deliberate collusion, several factors explain why gaps in trade statistics exist. Some argue that trade gaps may not be a useful entry point to estimate misinvoicing. Others demonstrate that gaps in reported trade statistics are neither erratic nor a statistical fiction, and that deliberate misinvoicing is a significant component of gaps in reported trade statistics.